LENIN'S TOMB

 

Monday, August 04, 2014

Israel, the Jews and Gaza: The Lies of BHL posted by Richard Seymour

This is a translation of an article by Alain Gresh, an editor of Le Monde Diplomatique. Amongst many other books, he is co-author with Dominique Vidal of The New A-Z of the Middle East: Second Edition (London, 2004).]  Translation by William Heidbreder from Alain Gresh, “Israel, les Juifs, et Gaza,” “Les Blogs du Diplo,” Le Monde Diplomatique, July 21, 2014.  Quotes from Bernard-Henri Levy, “Gaza-Paris,” translated by Steven B. Kennedy, Huffington Post, July 15, 2014.


With each Israeli offensive against Gaza, we are blessed with a new editorial by Bernard-Henri Lévy and an accumulation of lies.  This was the case in December 2008, when BHL gave an account of the Israeli invasion from a tank turret.  It was the case in November 2012.  It is again the case with his last chronicle, “Gaza Paris,” which appeared on the site of the review that he publishes and edits, The Rule of the Game, on July 15 of last year.  

The discredit of this essayist, whose books no longer sell, does not keep the media from opening their pages and studios to epigones.  The remainder of this article focuses on the lies pronounced by BHL with regard to Palestine, most of which he has repeated elsewhere. 


First lie: the photo (left) that illustrates the article and purports to show the Synagogue de la Rue Roquette Assiégée (Beseiged Synagogue of the Street of the Rocket).  Once again BHL ties himself in knots, for, according to the rabbi, there has been no attack on the establishment. [The term “beseiged” had been appended by BHL in reference to the recent demonstrations in Paris, some of which have attacked Jewish targets. - Trans.]  (See « Incidents rue de la Roquette : Serge Benhaim dément toute attaque de la synagogue »; “Incidents on the rue de la Roquette: Serge Benhaim denies any attack on the synagogue”; ITélé, July 18, 2014).  

So then where does this photo come from?

“Under cover of "the defense of Palestine," thousands gathered in Paris on Sunday to blame the Jews once again. These imbeciles intermingled with haters (or the other way around) need to be reminded, for what it's worth, that conflating Jews and Israelis in the same condemnation is the very principle of anti-Semitism, which, in France, is punishable by law.”

To assail the Jews?  We know that the story of the attack on the synagogue was presented in two parts.  First, that Agence France-Press, which reported it, had no journalist on the scene, and secondly, that the media generally has been reluctant to rectify this.  The statements of Michèle Sibony, Assistant Secretary General of the Union Juive Française pour la Paix (Union of French Jews for Peace; UJFP) on La Chaîne Info (Info Channel, a television network) cleared things up at the time, reminding viewers that not only was there no anti-semitic slogan at the demonstration, but that many Jews had participated.
We know that there have been some confrontations between the scoundrels of the Ligue de Défense Juive (Jewish Defense League; LDJ) — a fascist organization outlawed in Israel and the United States that the French authorities refuse to dissolve — and a hundred or so youths, a few of whom yelled anti-semitic slogans at their adversaries.  It is necessary to forcefully denounce them and to denounce all those who amalgamate Jew and Israeli.    

For, BHL is right: the identification of 'Jew' with 'Israeli' must end.  But who contributes to creating it?  Israel, which refuses the idea of an Israeli nationality, recognizing only Jews and Arabs among its citizens.  Israel, which affirms that it is a “Jewish state” and which calls its army a “Jewish army.”

And when the Israeli army organizes in May 2014 a meeting at La Synagogue de la Victoire [the Synagogue of Victory, also called The Grand Synagogue of Paris] in order to parade its merits and recruit, who has created the identification Israeli/Jew?  (In the face of “publicity” that proved a bit embarrassing, the meeting was cancelled).  When each year in Paris there is a festival to support the Israeli border police, how important is the conflict in France?  The French ambassador to Tel-Aviv does not fail to salute “the courageous engagement” of young French people in the Israeli army.  What would the French government say if young French Muslims went to fight in Palestine?  Yet he accepts that some French people are participating today in the offensive against Gaza.    

“They need to be reminded that no indignation, no form of solidarity with any cause whatsoever can excuse, much less justify, the pogrom-like act of forced entry into a synagogue.”
“These imbeciles intermingled with haters (or the other way around) need to hear that rallying behind cardboard Qassams representing the rockets fired blindly at women, children, and seniors -- in short, at Israeli civilians -- is not an ordinary act but a gesture of support for a terrorist enterprise.”
“To those among them, if any there be, who truly had the cause of Gaza at heart and who paraded under banners condemning the dozens of innocents killed since the Israeli counteroffensive began, it would perhaps be too cruel to ask why they are never there, never, on the same streets of Paris, to deplore not the dozens but the tens of thousands of other innocents killed in the past four years in another Arab land, Syria.” 

This argument has returned upon itself throughout the struggles of the last few decades.  You mobilize yourselves for the independence of Algeria; why do you do nothing against the Arab dictators?  You mobilize yourselves against American aggression in Vietnam; why do you not protest against the Gulag?  You denounce Apartheid South Africa, and the government in Pretoria retorts: consider instead the crimes committed in the Congo or in Ethopia.  

From “« Etats fantômes au Proche-Orient » (Phantom States of the Near East), Dossier du Monde diplomatique (dossier of Le Monde Diplomatique), July 2014:

“I do not know what permits us to tell BHL that the demonstrators who filled the streets these last days did not mobilize for other causes.  I know those among them who have done much to denounce the Syrian regime.  But it is true that the Palestinian cause is emblematic, not for the number of victims, but for the fact that it is the last colonial conflict.  I have for a long time explained in De quoi Palestine est-elle le nom? (Of What is Palestine the Name?) why it was the symbolic conflict, along the line of division between Orient and Occident, of North and South.  “But one will observe that, for these murdered ones, for the dozens of women, children, elderly persons: in brief, civilians, who, if the criminal flight in advance of Hamas is not stopped, will be, tomorrow, hundreds, there are not one, but two responsible parties: the pilot who, sighting a ramp of Iranian missiles hidden in the courtyard of a building, touches by mistake the adjacent building; but also, certainly at first, those monsters of cynicism who, to the pilot’s message announcing that he is going to fire and inviting the neighbors to leave the neighborhood in search of shelter, invariably respond: “No one move.  Everyone stay where they are.  That 10, 100 martyrs offer their blood for the sacred cause, inscribed in our charter, of the destruction of the state of the Jews.”     

It is immediately evident that the statement represented by BHL, “No one move, etc.,” is a pure fabrication.  It is clear that the Palestinians hesitate to leave their home for fear of it being pillaged and destroyed, as happens each time that certain practices of the armed groups - and recall that in Gaza there are fighting alongside Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (FPLP), and groups tied to Fatah - are subject to condemnation.  But we should equally recall that Amnesty International denounced in its 2010 report (on the Israeli invasion of Gaza) the use of Palestinians by the Israeli army as human shields.  And that, once again, it is not a matter of a fight between two equally equipped armies.  We should always remember the formula of the head of the Algerian National Liberation Front Larbi Ben M’hidi, arrested on February 23, 1957 by the French army and interrogated by journalists on the subject of the NLF placing bombs in cafés disguised in baskets: “Give us your airplanes; we will give you our baskets.” This man was “suicided” by Paul Aussaresses [a French army general known for torturing captured Algerians during the Algerian War - Trans.] several days later.
        
“And as for the others ... as for the newspapers and TV stations that do not cease to evoke in a circular fashion Israeli “aggression,” or the “prison” that Gaza has become, or the “spiral” of acts of “violence” and “vengeances” supposed to feed this war without end, one may object to them:”
“1. That there has been no aggression, but a counter-attack by Israel in the face of the hail of missiles that, once again, press down upon the cities and that no nation in the world would have tolerated for so long.”    

If France were hit by rockets from Switzerland or Belgium, would it not respond to this aggression?  Except that France hasn't been occupying Switzerland and Belgium for the last few decades, and consequently isn't at great risk of being a bombing target.    

“2. Although Gaza is, in effect, a kind of prison, since the Israelis cleared it more than ten years ago, it is hard to see how they could be the jailers — but what, in contrast, about Hamas, which holds the enclave in its grip, which treats its inhabitants like hostages and which, although a single word would suffice, or, in any case, a hand extended in order to end the nightmare, prefers to go to the limit of its criminal folly?”  

Only BHL could believe that there are no jailers in Gaza.  These jailers may well be on the outside; yet, the Gaza strip remains an occupied territory: the United Nations continues to consider it as such because access routes by land, sea, and air remain dependent on Israel - which forbids access to important parts of Gaza (30% of farmlands) as well as the sea beyond 6 miles (reduced to 3 miles since the beginning of the operation)—, that civil status remains in the hands of the Israelis, that the blockade maintained by Israel since 2007 remains in force, despite the unanimous “verbal” condemnation by the international community, including the United States. 

“3. That between the acts of violence and vengeance that are presented to us as “symmetrical,” between the murder of three Jewish teenagers who were kidnapped and found murdered near Hebron and the murder of a young Palestinian burned alive, two days later, by a gang of barbarians who bring shame upon Israel’s ideals, there is a difference that changes, alas, nothing about the mourning of the four families which, for those who have the opportunity and, thus, the obligate to keep a cool head, changes everything: Israel’s political, judicial, and moral authorities were horrified at the second, condemned it without reserve, and arranged it so that the presumed guilty persons were tracked down and arrested without delay; for the first, which the authors are always pursuing, it was necessary to have very sharp ears to hear each word that was sounded in the ranks of the Palestinians — if, all the same, a phrase like that of Khaled Mechaal, “congratulating” the “hands” which have “kidnapped” three young people, brutally re-qualified, for the occasion, as “Jewish colonists.”   
   
BHL seems to ignore the campaigns of hate that have unfolded in Israel for years and that have led a majority of the inhabitants to desire the expulsion from the state of the Arab citizens.  Ignore again the role of colonists and small groups of the extreme right that have enjoyed, for years, an absolute impunity, and that have caused acts of aggression against the Arabs to multiply.
      
“I doubt whether these observations will have any effect on the Sunday jihadists, the same crowd who deplore one day that they are deprived of the right to laugh with Dieudonné [a French comedian who became subject to a storm of controversy for reputed anti-semitism, in part because of a television depiction of an Israeli settler as a Nazi. -Trans.], the next that they are prevented from paying their respects to Mohammed Merah, the killer of seven children in Toulouse, and the day after that that French foreign policy does not line up solidly behind the pro-Hamas protesters.”

This is what one can call an amalgam.  Does it really merit a response? 

“As for the rest of France, for the millions men and women of good will who have not given up the dream of one day seeing that land peaceably shared, it would be wonderful if they could break the cycle of disinformation and lazy thinking. Between Israel and Hamas, the wrongs are not equally distributed. Hamas is a fascislamist organization from the grips of which the inhabitants of Gaza, among others, must urgently be liberated. As for the head of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, who calls on the United Nations to apply "pressure" on Israel, would it not be more logical, more dignified, and above all more effective for him to demand of the religious zealots who, in the last few weeks have once again become his partners in government, that they immediately lay down their arms.”

“Read « Pourquoi les négociations au Proche-Orient échouent toujours? » (Why do the Negotiations in the Near East Always Fail?,” Le Monde Diplomatique, June 2014:


“Would withdrawing the weapons, as BHL demands, lead to peace?  It was around ten years ago, after the death of Yasser Arafat, that Mahmoud Abbas negotiated with Israel, pursued a security cooperation with the occupation army, a cooperation he referred to as “sacred.” Hamas did not take part in the negotiations and will not in the future as it is not the Palestinian government that negotiates but the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).  And what is the result of these negotiations?  More settlements, more settlers, more repression, an absolute refusal to return the territories occupied in 1967.  As for the “fascism” of Hamas, recall that there are among the factions in the Israeli government those that, which were they elected in any European country, would be denounced by BHL, and he would refuse to receive them.  Is an Israeli Jewish fascist more acceptable that a Dutch or Austrian fascist?”

“The inhabitants of the Gaza Strip,” BHL recognizes, “deserve to be treated as more than human shields.”

Yes, give peace a chance.  Apply sanctions against Israel so that it will finally agree to adhere to the UN resolutions, renounce colonization, and evacuate the occupied territories. 

12:51:00 pm | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus