LENIN'S TOMB

 

Friday, October 15, 2010

Austerity and the Tories' bruisers. posted by Richard Seymour

I take it as read that the austerity project is an inherently unstable project with a narrow and fissile social base supporting it. There are two ways in which this instability can become a crisis - economic collapse, and political insurgency. But when does crisis become a potential defeat?

Allow for the fact that the ruling classes driving this policy, and the political executives guiding them through parliaments, parlements, Bundestags, senates, Cortes, upper chambers and lower houses, have planned in advance for unpopularity, strikes, and potentially some degree of economic turmoil. The end goal of refuelling the City through a stupendous transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich, of reducing wages, of breaking up the public sector unions, and of opening up more of the state to private profit and speculation, is more than enough to justify some temporary unrest, and even a brief dip in economic growth - indeed, for those of an Austrian persuasion, a renewed recession would arguably help by flushing out more bad investments and debts.

Of course, the political fall-out from this attack on what is essentially still a compromise of some kind between capital and labour could well revitalise those social forces that were so depleted by the Thatcher/Reagan 'revolution'. And the austerity project is certainly generating some unease among ruling class fractions in the United Kingdom. A Conservative government stakes its legitimacy strongly on its ability to make capitalism work better for capital, and if its measures don't appear to be restoring profitability - or even risk making the situation grimly worse - then it can lose business support very quickly. On the other hand, if the marxist analysis is right, then the Conservative Party's role is also to take executive decisions on behalf of its class, the ruling class, to win its political struggles even where that class is itself divided and lacks resolve. And the Tories are ruthless political pugilists who are more than prepared to be hated as long as they can achieve their ends without fundamentally damaging their ability to act as a hegemonic party of the ruling class.

So, what would it take to for them to start worrying about defeat, and backing down? An ominous sign for the government is what is happening on the other frontiers of fiscal retrenchment, where the process is more advanced. In France and Greece, as you already know, political and industrial rebellions are putting austerity governments under severe pressure. In Ireland, the trade unions are being joined by the police, and even by some business lobbies, in opposing Brian Cowen's latest cuts programme. (Obviously, one expects the peelers to be paid off before things go too far, because no government wants to lose effective authority on the streets). The opposition is being generated by one simple fact: the cuts are not even delivering the advertised outcome, of 'fiscal consolidation'. They are actually strangling all signs of economic recovery, thereby increasing the deficit. It's contributing to a profound political crisis for the government, which they're having to try to resolve by coopting opposition parties into the process. That's the sort of scale of crisis, in which fractions of capital start turning against the government of the day, and in which the government's authority and ability to implement its agenda is in question, that would do for the Tories.

The evidence suggests that the British economy is sinking again, as the more far-sighted pundits anticipated. That will worry and potentially divide the capitalist class. Unemployment is rising. The housing markets are also suffering, which will punish the very middle class voters that both Tories and Liberals have been trying to woo. That will contribute to fracturing and eroding the coalition's popular base. The government's popularity was already in the negative before these trends became apparent, and before the first concrete examples of the depth and depravity of these cuts became known. We now have the tuition fees debacle in front of us, and the attack on public sector pensions. We have the signs of industrial action starting in the capital, and potentially coordinated - the germ of an idea that ought to be nationalised has taken root. Considering this, and looking overseas, the government has to be dusting off those worst case scenarios and preparing for a difficult ride.

A situation of this character places a heightened premium on political leadership, and the question is whether the Tories, as ruthless and hard-headed as they are, are made of the same mettle as the bonecrunchers of the New Right. I do not believe they are. I have explained elsewhere why I think they are electorally weak, and ideologically incoherent. It is worth adding that it's been a while since they were the powerful and dangerous entity of the Thatcher era, landing blow after blow on the labour movement. They're out of practise, out of training, only recently recovering from shambolic opposition. No less important is the question of leadership in the organised labour movement, of course, but that is for another post.

Labels: austerity, capitalism, capitalist crisis, david cameron, finance capital, neoliberalism, recession, socialism, tories, working class

2:49:00 pm | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus