LENIN'S TOMB

 

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Gendered empire. posted by Richard Seymour

It so happens that the various appeals to feminism in support of empire are not new. For example, when postcolonial studies was taking off as a discipline during the 1980s, Valerie Amos and Pratibha Parmar wrote an essay entitled Challenging imperial feminism, charging that a white, Eurocentric discourse was being asserted as the only legitimate form of feminism. They and others critiqued the production of 'third world women' as a homogenous and inert group of victims, robbing them of agency and sustaining the myth of Western superiority. There have since been several wide-ranging studies of the 'colonial skeletons in the family cupboard' of Western feminists. The feminist author Clare Midgley, in her collection Gender and Imperialism, took on an aspect of this past that intersects with 'humanitarian' imperialism: the roots of imperial feminism in the British anti-slavery movement.

The British anti-slavery movement was in its day a powerful social movement with comparatively moderate and radical wings, and some elite supporters for whom slavery was permissible if it was wage slavery (obviously, I refer to William Wilberforce). It commanded enormous support: at one time an anti-slavery petition in Manchester was signed by every literate worker in the city. From within it developed over the long term a feminist movement which, contesting slavery, nevertheless did not go so far as lauding the example of Toussaint L'Ouverture and the overthrow of colonial domination: they accepted, as did many of their fellow campaigners, the necessity for British colonies in the Carribean and elsewhere. Indeed, the eradication of slavery itself became a means of legitimising continued British imperial expansion in the Victorian era. In the US, there was a direct link between women campaigning for their freedom and for that of the slaves, and while in Britain no such integration could be found, there were practical and ideological connections to be drawn. The British feminist campaigners described enslaved women as sisters, precisely as the campaigners against the promulgation of the Contagious Diseases Act in India professed a sodality with colonised women.

In representing their sisters as passive victims unable to represent themselves or defend themselves, they solemnly undertook the task of defending the "helpless, voiceless, hopeless" "dumb animal". Though regarding non-white men as especially endowed with innate propensities for violence against women, they were "wounded" to hear that these women were also being oppressed not merely by "some half-wild, benighted Race" but "by those who are connected with us by the closest ties". Their claim to fuller participation in public life was underwritten by their role as moral reformers of the empire. Midgley cites the writings of the early feminist Catherine Macaulay, who not only sees nothing positive about the condition of women in non-Western societies, but sees it as a static affair, unchangingly oppressive and oppressively unchanging. She cites Mary Wollstonecraft, who locates in 'savage' African and 'despotic' Oriental societies a past 'night of sensual ignorance' which European women can escape from by becoming (and being allowed to become) more like rational European men. And so on, throughout the canon, the same tropes are repeatedly discovered. And of course this had practical expression: the first recorded group of female petitions to parliament concerned the practise of sati, in which the bride of a deceased Hindu man would either immolate herself in a funeral pyre or be coerced into doing so. There must be some people reading this who are thinking that such intervention is exactly right, precisely the kind of concern for human well-being that is needed. But such a touching reaction would miss the point here, which is that this provided a form of ideological legitimacy for the empire itself, whose brutality was stupendous and incalculable. It demanded a Human Rights Watch policy from an exploitative, murderous system, whose right to exist was never questioned. One may as well ask Hitler to put an end to the barbaric practise of circumcision.

It is unsurprising that this overlapped with missionary interventionism prominent at the time, not only in India, but most noticeably in Africa. By 1899, it was estimated that more women than men were engaged in missionary work in the 'foreign field', and the rise of female missionaries itself reflects the growing involvement of middle class women into paid employment and education. Their work of converting the natives to the correct monotheism involved them in a curious dual conviction: at the same time as they affirmed 'traditional' female roles, they also regarded themselves as uniquely free. They too professed a mission of sisterhood with the colonised, whom they also saw as passive, pitiable and innocent victims - a representation that was informed by racial idioms, but which provided a literary device by which they could understand themselves as autonomous, empowered agents. Their imperial role was a means, not of emancipating the women they professed divine solidarity with, but of ameliorating and re-imagining their own conditions. The role of fantasy in social agency should not be underestimated.

'Feminism' is necessarily a polysemic term, and so its relationship with imperialism and nationhood can vary. For example, the right-wing League of German Women's Associations (BDF) in imperial Germany explicitly advocated nationalism and imperial expansion, excluding the socialists from their ranks, denying charges from right-wing anti-feminists of internationalist sympathies, and requesting better treatment so that they may take part in professional labour and have their children looked after. Helen Lange, a prominent activist in the Kaiserreich and supporter of the BDF, insisted that the only reason women were turning to internationalism was because German men had so alienated them that they had to look elsewhere for solidarity, a danger that had to be rectified with better rights for women. (But not the rights of citizenship!) By contrast, the SPD and socialists such as Rosa Luxemburg insisted that capitalist social relations, and particularly the emphasis on family units ('the building block of the nation') were responsible for the subordination of women, and were mainly avowed internationalists and foes of the empire. They demanded the fullest participatory democracy, a tradition known correctly as socialism. The correct inference appears to be that if you wish to be a feminist and support empire, you must drastically curtail your reforming ambition.

And this, of course, is what characterises our contemporary imperial feminists, so complacently assured of their own freedom (defined negatively against the unfreedom of the native), identifying with the imperial state as the legitimate bearer of emancipation for third world women. At most, they wish to reform the empire - so, if Bush is hopeless, put Al Gore in charge and he'll know what to do.

11:28:00 pm | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus