LENIN'S TOMB

 

Sunday, January 07, 2007

Israel threatens to nuke Iran. posted by Richard Seymour

Some while ago, Rashid Khalidi suggested that what is loosely referred to as the 'Israel Lobby' was really a means by which the US ruling class maintained internal discipline, over a wide range of issues not strictly limited to foreign policy. It's a curious relationship: the American government pays for Israel to sustain itself as a garrison state based on supremacy over the Arabs, with nuclear weapons and hawk fighters and so on; and in return, Israel takes some of its enormous subsidies and uses it to discipline the Western media and political classes through officially encouraged lobbies, thus allowing this tiny country in the Levant to be seen to be controlling matters. The two responses that take this appearance at face value are reformism, and antisemitism: the former says there's nothing essentially wrong, but some deformities are introduced into the system by extremists with well-funded political agendas; you can guess what the latter says at various registers.

So, when Israel threatens to use nuclear weapons against Iran (mimicking the 'preemptive strike' doctrine), guess how they word it? Well:

Israeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.


It is presented as a little bit of blackmail: if American politicians respond to public pressure and try to block an attempted attack on Iran, well Israel may step in and do something crazy with those nuclear weapons they pretend not to have. As if. The only circumstances under which this would occur would be if such a strike had been tacitly or secretly endorsed or encouraged by the United States executive in the first place. But this story describes the ludicrous image of the US as a restraining force.

Of course, the Sunday Times performs its mandatory propaganda functions, reminding us of what Ahmadinejad is supposed to have said (but didn't) about wiping Israel off the map, telling us what "Israeli officials believe" (that they're defending themselves against the possibility of a second Holocaust), vividly depicting what kind of terrifying bombs Iran may be able to accrue under certain circumstances etc. It would be too obvious to imagine what the reaction would be if Iran threatened a nuclear strike against Israel (don't even mention the US), based on the repeated threats made against it. And the absurdity of wiping out nuclear facilities with nuclear weapons, not to mention the monstrosity of the action, the potentially huge cost to Iranian lives, is also far too close to one's nose to even notice.

And this is a very specific threat - the details leaked by these "Israeli officials" are deliberately chosen to emphasise that the threat is operative, that training is underway to carry it out, and that it has done so before (Osirak is mentioned). Had a tithe of this been true of Iraq in 2003, there wouldn't have been anywhere near as many people protesting against Bush's 'preemptive' invasion. You wouldn't have been able to escape even for five seconds from the constant barrage of emergency bulletins, cod patriotic declarations, moralising cant, invective against 'pacifists' and alarmist news stories. Blair would have been even more cringeworthy, Bush would have been even more callous, and bombs would have been even more rapidly delivered to every urban centre, including alleged installations. Israel can issue these threats, precisely because it is under no threat itself. It faces no serious prospect of facing a single Iranian bullet unless it actually initiates an aggressive war. Which means that the excuse offered for making the threat in the first place is a pathetic lie.

The US government clearly wants to keep the fires stoked for a potential attack, as Blood and Treasure points out. Take the recent propaganda effort in which an Iranian guest of the Iraqi government (also, once a guest of the US President) was arrested, and accused of bearing documents that demonstrate the intention to bring chaos to Iraq through both Sunni and Shiite insurgent groups. Or take the Iran Syria Policy and Operations Group, whose role is to coordinate an offensive against both countries, particularly Iran, by giving covert support to Washington-friendly dissidents and hyping allegations of an Iranian role in the 1994 attack on a community centre in Argentina. The propaganda may work: a recent poll suggests that about half of Americans still believe there was some connection between Hussein and the 9/11 attacks. The lesson that the US government will take from this must be a mixed one, of course, since it suggests that there are a large number of Americans who think Iraq had something to do with 9/11, yet should not have been invaded. But it also suggests that if you repeat Iran, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction in the same sentence for long enough, you might well get results.

1:46:00 pm | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus