LENIN'S TOMB

 

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Nicaragua: "They did everything but threaten to invade". posted by Richard Seymour

As Ortega looks to have won the Nicaraguan presidential elections, the Houston Chronicle discusses the failure of Bush's campaign to subvert the Nicaraguan elections. There is nothing new here: cut off aid, and threaten an economic blockade if they (the voters) don't follow orders. The US stated beforehand that it would consider any attempt to remove immunity from prosecution for its man Enrique Bolanas and try him for corruption a "coup", and would respond "very, very forcibly". I mentioned back in September that these threats had alienated even opponents of the former leader and Sandinista candidate, Daniel Ortega. Paul Trivelli, the US ambassador to Nicaragua, explained that "we have been trying to speak in a more direct way so that people understand what our decision is." If the pre-election polls are accurate, then the FSLN will have a clear plurality in the National Assembly and control most of the departments in the country, despite US threats. Yet it was always a certainty that Ortega's opponents would cry foul on the result, even though it is not at all close, and they are now doing so, thus providing the excuse for any potential intervention. America rules. America's decision is final - and, potentially, terminal.

The US intervention in Nicaragua during the 1980s was characterised by an underground invasion, using Honduras-based former National Guards in collusion with Argentinian Nazis to recruit Nicaraguan peasants and train them in the methods of terror. CIA-provided intelligence enabled them to target clinics and schools, the kinds of institutions that the Sandinistas had built up to improve health and literacy. They tortured, raped and terrorised their way through Nicaragua, often carrying out terror that would later be laid at the doorstep of the Sandinistas (driving out Miskito Indians and preventing their return, for instance). On top of this strategy, an annually renewed embargo was imposed, which effectively bled Nicaragua dry. After a decade of terror that claimed about 30,000 lives (and it would have been more had the US been in possession of the state, as in El Salvador), elections were held under threat of further annihilation. There had been elections in 1984, in which the Sandinistas easily took over two thirds of the vote, but while credible observers regarded them as fair, Western media outlets followed the United States in describing them as rigged, marked by state terror and so on - this during a massive US-led war on the country. Toward the end of the 1980s, it was that the Contras could not win militarily, and were eager for a peaceful settlement: the US blocked this several times, but finally let up with the proviso that elections could be held and that if the UNO led by Violeta Chammoro did not win, the terror war would resume, and the blockade would continue: if she did win, peace and aid would be forthcoming. Moreover, anyone who queued up to vote for her would receive $40. She won, with slightly less than 55% of the vote. That farce was considered a free election and greeted with the usual howls of approbation. In subsequent elections, the anti-Sandinista parties have repeatedly invoked the terror of the 1980s as a reason not to vote for the FSLN.

At any rate, that era of American terror, which was part of a wave of suppression that engulfed the entirety of Central and much of Southern America, is now routinely referred to as a "US-backed insurgency". This is the standard view. I mentioned Paul Berman's enthusiastic 'anti-totalitarian' backing for the Contras a while ago. I was reading through his New Yorker article from 1996 this morning, partly to remind myself of what I hate his guts, and I was struck by the fact that if you only read his accounts, you would not understand that there was a US-led blockade, that there were free elections in 1984, that the elections in 1990 were grotesquely fixed and staged in the context of national terror and deliberate impoverishment, that the Contras repressed and killed their alleged supporters etc; you would instead come away with the inference that the Contras had developed as a domestic insurgency against a commie government trying to take away the peasants' land and stop them from selling goods in their local market place, that they perhaps had bad leadership and some extremist fringes but were essentially a force for democracy, that the 1990 elections were the first elections to have taken place since the 1979 revolution, that there were no problems with them, and that they demonstrated not the success of US terror but the unpopularity of the Sandinistas. So degraded is this man's probity that he relies, throughout this lengthy piece, on several days of conversations with a former Contra fighter. He is not completely ironic in describing the Sandinistas as "atheist, totalitarian, Cuban, satanic and anti-peasant". But Berman's views more or less reflect those expressed by Washington at the time, not to mention the overwhelming consensus of the media.

And so, if we witness a repeat blockade and another round of putschist terror, we will hear from people like Berman that Ortega is at any rate an old totalitarian who has abandoned his support for abortion rights, cuddles up with the Catholic Church, likes Castro too much and hangs out with Chavez.

9:49:00 am | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus