LENIN'S TOMB

 

Friday, March 03, 2006

Alien Nation posted by Richard Seymour

"Happiness is a new idea in Europe" - Saint-Just.

A survey reported on BBC News this morning reported that 90% of Londoners are unhappy with their day to day lives. In 2001, the Observer reported:



Despite the highest British income levels ever and a buoyant economy, researchers - who interviewed 1,000 people - found most were profoundly unhappy: 55 per cent said they had felt depressed in the past year.

Now, there's a moralistic left response to this, which is to affirm that human happiness pertains to matters greater than shopping, and to identify the problem as one of consumerism, greed, avarice, a lack of solidarity and so on. See this Polly Toynbee wheedle for instance. Citing LSE lectures by sociologist Richard Layard, she claims that once people have risen above desperate poverty, it really makes little difference what one's income is: unhappiness becomes the rule, and much of the blame is placed on shopping. To be fair, Toynbee does also note that while GDP per head tends to make little difference to the national aggregate of happiness (yeah yeah), the unequal distribution of income contributes greatly to unhappiness within nations. To wit (from Layard): "In 1975 39% of the rich (in the top quarter) were very happy, compared with only 19% of the poor (in the bottom quarter). This would lead you to expect that when the people in the bottom quarter became richer, as they had by 1998, they would also have become happier. But they did not." (I can't quite get my head round Layard's charts, though - he reckons people from Northern Ireland are among the happiest people on earth. Has he ever visited that fucking place?)

Unhappiness is indeed related to inequality, and has curious effects:


Comparing two countries in which the poor have equal real incomes, the one in which the rich are wealthier is likely to have a higher infant mortality rate. This anomalous result does not appear to spring from measurement error in estimating the income of the poor, and the association between high infant mortality and income inequality is still present after controlling for other factors such as education, medical personnel, and fertility. The positive association of infant mortality and the income of the rich suggests that measured real incomes may be a poor measure of social welfare. (Robert J. Waldmann (1992), “Income Distribution and Infant Morality,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107:4, pp. 1283-1302).





But of course what this moralistic analysis misses is the crucial dimension of class analysis, or to put it another way, exploitation. If we don't account for this, then we are left with a debate between liberal vicars arguing for a nicer, happier, more genteel society and vicious neoliberals arguing that such unhappiness is mere resentment, the 'politics of envy', and that the winners are not to blame for the failings of the losers. It is a sterile argument, and it invites us to revel in what Nietzsche calls 'slave morality', in which our plea for nicer, fairer treatment by the rich, our toothless misery, testifies to our moral superiority. It strikes me as partially the heritage of a teetotalling sentimentality in traditional Labourism. One might add that focusing on what might be described as a mere excess of the system, perhaps a mere result of revanchist rightism and the neoliberal assault on Keynesianism, this moralism does an excellent service to capital. From the citadels of secular liberalism, we are called upon to pursue a moral renewal rather than a class struggle. And there is absolutely no irony in that: Western liberals are Christians in drag.

Winners & Losers: Changes in Average Household Net Worth, 1983 - 1995, US.


Babeuf's doctrine:

Unhappiness and slavery flow from inequality, and the latter from property. Property is thus the greatest of society’s plagues. It is a veritable public offence.

Perhaps the misappropriation of the Marx's concept of alienation, and particularly of commodity fetishism, by liberals and some theologians is therefore understandable. The concept originates in Judeo-Christian discourse (alienation from the Kingdom of God etc), and shorn of its unpleasant materialist imbrications and the implication of class struggle, it can be restored to its spiritual domain. Sure, I've heard it said, meaning is taken from our day to day lives because the only universality in the secular-liberal universe that really matters is saleability. Certainly, in separating conception from action, in reproducing a series of actions under pain of losing our livelihood, we experience a spiritual loss. Hence, the answer is to suffuse social action with a moral and ethical structure, to reconnect with God, to reconstitute the mythical lost 'community', to have more respect for one another, to give to charity, to stop obsessing about how much stuff we have, to resist consumerism, to 'forgive' Third World debt (which is really to 'forgive' the expropriators of the Third World, Mother Theresa-style) to seek reform and encourage corporate social responsibility etc. It isn't too far down this road to Asbos (in which the government criminalises behaviour that is not criminal), cuts in disability benefit (in which the poor are told by Mr Blunkett that they will find more meaning in work than in watching television all day), tuition fees (in which the workshy students are to be given an incentive, a work ethic to structure their otherwise shiftless, drifting lives), and so on.

Alienation is the process by which capital treats a human being as a commodity, paying for that commodity a rate secured on a labour market. The commodity does not decide anything, unless capital says so. The commodity is a problem to the extent that she is human, and the management and smoothing out of these human tendencies is necessary to integrate her into the cycle of capitalist production. That integration, the acceptance that one is a commodity, purchased for increasingly longer hours in the day to perform specified tasks (and some unspecified ones too), is essential to the creation of surplus value. Without surplus value, there is no profit, and without profit there is no capital. Of course being reduced to a commodity for most of one's waking day makes you unhappy. Of course living for others, waking up for others, timing one's journeys for others, regulating one's leisure time for others, is a source of unhappiness. Of course, the inequality that derives from exploitation is a source of unhappiness. Capitalism is radically inhuman: it is the source of alienation and unhappiness. How could it be otherwise? Autonomy, equality and justice are human needs.



8:05:00 am | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus