LENIN'S TOMB

 

Saturday, July 09, 2005

Marxism, capitalism and imperialism: from fellow-travellers to evil-doers. posted by Richard Seymour

News says thousands of Brummies are casually bolting it out of the city centre on the orders of police. I expect (or hope) it is a false alarm, and that they are merely being over-cautious. In London, meanwhile, sirens are still wailing like startled banshees up and down the roads, and the weekly fireworks show up at Kenwood on Hampstead Heath is punctuating the skein of city-noise with technicolour explosions, neonising the night sky with a full chromatic diapason. Whose idea was it to have that again this week? Would the millionaires up on the hill kindly keep the noise down?

Long post coming.

Yesterday morning, Galloway and Benn did a double-act alongside a Portuguese Left Bloc MP, discussing the bombings and the socialist response to them. Benn took his traditional approach, which was to say that we urgently need to pursue peaceful means of international politics, the threat of terrorism won't subside until we do, and many many people will agree with us if we raise an emphatic campaign. The Portuguese MP was, in many ways, more interesting. Aside from some fairly straightforward points about resisting the escalating cycle of terror and war, she asked why it is that fundamentalism is on the rise - not merely in Asia Minor, the North of Africa and parts of South Asia, but also in North America. And her tentative answer was that there had been a "collapse of the future", and that the stifling persistence of the present was driving people to seek utopian, millenarian answers to their problems. The answer was, in part, to re-open the future as a vision, renew the projects of human emancipation that could see society in its various forms as a human artefact, not natural or inevitable in any of those forms. Galloway said what needed to be said, and a few other things besides, adding that if some of what he was saying appeared to strike a discordant note for some, this was simply because he wasn't prepared to see this tragedy emblazoned any further with Blair's hypocrisy. Quite right too. A BBC interviewer stood at the door, arms folded, in a crisp suit, while a harassed looking camera man took some shots for a news slot.

Jeremy Corbyn MP and Chris Harman conducted an excellent discussion on the recent uprisings in Bolivia, with the former providing the broad brush treatment and the latter hammering out the condensed class analysis. A translator laboured away at a low volume for Spanish speakers at the back of the room. Among many interesting revelations was the fact that when the government offered a deal based on early elections and a constitutional reshuffle of some sort, Evo Morales received calls from various Latin American leaders urging him to accept - including, unfortunately, Hugo Chavez. It struck me as entirely consistent with Chavez's political strategy, in which he sees his wily operations as substituting for, or occasionally convoking, mass action. He, after all, considers himself a political ally to, and student of, Fidel Castro. According to Richard Gott's book about Chavez, Castro advised him not to resist any coup attempt in April 2002, not to sacrifice his life - he was too important. Far better to allow the coup, as 'this does not end here'. That, again, is exemplary substitutionism, and quite predictable coming from a dictator who professes socialism yet prefers the working class to shut their yaps and pimp their kids out to rich tourists (Gary Glitter, it is you I speak of).

Today, David Harvey and Alex Callinicos had a meeting on The New Imperialism, which is the title of Harvey's most recent book. I was very impressed by Harvey's arguments, and gratified to note that Callinicos simply prefaced his contribution by saying "I agree with everything he's just said" - I think a tendency in the old days would have been to locate some totemic disagreement and pick away at it from time to time, although I could be fabulating. What Harvey said was very simple: the United States has from day one tried to be an imperial power, manifest both in its actions and in the quasi-predestinarian ideologies of Manifest Destiny. In the pursuit of this, it initially tried traditional colonial means. For instance, the colonisation of the Phillipines at the start of the century, and the attempt in the 1920s to take Nicaragua. In the Phillipines, they had no difficulties besides having to kill a few tens of thousands of natives, before handing the country over to a junta dominated by hacienda owners. In Nicaragua, they found themselves getting bogged down in a guerilla war against rural rebels, and so they concocted what turned out to be a much more effective means of projecting power over long distances. Basically, they assassinated the Liberal leader Augusto Sandino (hence, Sandinistas), and created a National Guard, which a handsome young Anastasio Somoza (formerly a careerist with the Liberals) was placed in charge of. He took control of the country in 1936, and inaugurated a dynasty that was to rule in the most brutal and corrupt manner until 1979.

This was a template that the US could apply to the world. In the first half of the 20th Century, the US applied the Monroe Doctrine in what it regarded as its hemisphere, while relying on the still mighty British to subdue hostile forces in Eurasia. Following the Second World War, with the red zones of the British Empire receding, the US reconstituted a precarious European capitalism through Marshall Plan aid (unlike those dusky nations, not a cent was ever paid back by whitey, and no one ever asked for it). It also set up some global institutions, which were adapted and meddled with over time, including the UN (which was founded under the direction of Leo Pavolsky, much to the chagrin of the disdainful Dean Acheson).

The US dominated in production, developed a bedazzling cultural hegemony that initially seduced both Fidel Castro and Ho Chi Minh, and deployed its forces to aggressively enlarge its 'sphere of influence'. By the 1970s, Nemesis arrived: as Vietnam became a synonym for 'quagmire', and recession bolted out of the not-quite-blue, a Japanese sun rose over Detroit. The US ceased to dominate productively, and its cultural mass appeal had taken a knock or two. Failing to dominate in terms of production and technical innovation, the US turned toward the financialisation of the global economy, using the IMF, World Bank and various other mechanisms to open up trade barriers and create opportunities for the profitable deployment of surplus value. However, the increasing mobility of capital that this allowed was traumatic for the United States - waves of deindustrialisation hit the country, beginning with textiles, and ending with the crisis that caused Chrysler to be temporarily nationalised, along with a number of banks. The US was, however, able to benefit from its financial dominance, as well as patenting and licensing laws, and the repatriation of profit from offshore production, which alleviated some of the effects of deindustrialisation back home. Meanwhile, debt crises and economic catastrophe for many newly industrialising countries was a boon for the United States. If debt could not be repaid, this was a means by which an economy could be 'restructured' to enable access to resources for US capital. Similarly, when the South East Asian financial collapse occured, the currencies collapsed, and there was a general flight to the dollar: thus creating unemployment and misery on one end of the world, and extraordinary benefits for an affluent middle class on the other.

The Dollar Wall-Street Regime, as Peter Gowan has baptised it, has had its own run of difficulties of late, which would have been perhaps even more entrenched had it not been for 9/11, and the extraordinary nationalist revival as well as the reflation of a despised Republican Party whose executive had a propensity for authoritarian statism. Similarly, the US is now an imperial power in a multipolar world without hegemony. It can no longer rely on 'soft-power'. It will try to maintain Europe under the coercive umbrella of Natoism, which is why NATO has been placed in charge of Afghanistan, and UK troops are being shipped from Iraq to take care of operations in the South Asian protectorate - for the first time since Dr Watson had his arms bandaged.

But the US is in a dangerous predicament. It has to demonstrate its power more and more - just as it wiped out Hiroshima in a terrifying display of technological prowess, so it used 'shock and awe' from 30,000 feet to send a message to the world. The chief recipient of the first message was the USSR; the main receptacle for "shock n awe" is China. Harvey suggested that one of the reasons Rumsfeld was moaning about the lack of good targets in Afghanistan, and pushing an Iraqi venture instead, was that a display of military might would not look so good if you were pounding one of the poorest countries in the world, with the least entrenched state in the world.

And China is a real problem for the United States. On the one hand, US corporations love it. Wal Mart would not exist if it weren't for Chinese slave labour - *cough* - I mean, 'market reforms' and 'liberalisation'. The same can be said for many US corporations. On the other hand, there is a real risk of China expanding to such an extent that it actually represents a substantial threat to US interests. One anecdote that summarised this predicament turned on evidence given by Condoleeza Rice to the 9/11 investigators: she had said that one reason she hadn't been obsessed with terrorism was that China had downed a US spy plane, and there was a serious prospect of the US going to war with China (which sort of defeats the proposition, advanced by thinkers as different as Antonio Negri and Leo Panitch, that there can no longer be serious rivalries among advanced capitalist powers). It was, apparently, the decisive intervention of Wal Mart that prevented any escalation of hostilities.

The consequences are various: according to Zbigniew Brzezinski, US imperialism needs a united European handmaiden or junior partner, as it cannot fight alone (which is why so many 'realists' were disappointed by the EU referendum results); it also needs to demonstrate its power - using, as the Project for the New American Century put it, this "window of opportunity" to extend US influence and deter the rise of a major opposing superpower; but it is weak, and so fissures can be opened up which will weaken it further still and eventually defeat it and what it represents.

Samir Amin, the great Egyptian economist, a man whom I admire immensely, and the author of many great books on Eurocentrism, liberalism, and obsolescent capitalism, made a very interesting suggestion from the floor. He had been reading the text-books absorbed by American business school students, and found a very strange fact: whereas previously, a large corporation needed a customer base of 100 million, they now needed a minimum base of 600 million. This meant that national capitalisms could no longer be self-sufficient, if they ever were. Economies had 'globalised', whether they liked it or not. This meant that to some extent there remained an overlap of interest between the advanced capitalist economies. I think this may explain in part why even relatively 'independent' countries like France and Germany eventually bit the bullet - even if they didn't swallow it - over Iraq. The discourse of globalisation is, aside from being largely portentous shite, totally incapable of accounting for this situation. But this development does conform slightly to one of the expectations of 'globalisation' theorists: namely that nation-states are, whatever their own particular logics and proclivities, being eroded by processes beyond their control.

10:44:00 pm | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus