LENIN'S TOMB

 

Thursday, January 08, 2004

Cold War? I've Got Some Cream for That! posted by Richard Seymour

It turns out all that bad shit the US got up to was because of the Cold War . Yeah, see, all that stuff about overturning democracies and sponsoring a network of Third World sub-fascist regimes was actually an exercise in containment, deterring the Soviet Union from marching across Europe, flying to Central America, approaching the Texan border and killing the firstborn of every American family. It's as well we found this out, because it means we can relax and trust the US to intervene wherever its reach will allow it, secure in the knowledge that its purpose will be to protect the innocent and create a front of lively democracies to drive back terrorism and bring down tyrannies wherever they may be.

Naturally, there isn't a hint of sarcasm intended here because, as Joseph Conrad pointed out, "revolutionaries have no taste for irony". I mean it. So when I say that a few things about the Cold War and the subsequent Balmy Peace confuse me, you better take my word for it. For instance, we commonly hear that the Cold War started because of Soviet "aggression", with Stalin carving Germany into two chunks and trying to drive the US out of "their" half. Somewhat confounding this obvious truth, Carolyn Eisenberg makes the bewildering claim that "the United States had abandoned Yalta and Potsdam, that it was pushing the formation of a Western German state against the misgivings of many Europeans" and that "the Soviets had launched the blockade to prevent partition". (Carolyn Eisenberg, Drawing the Line: The American Decision to Divide Germany, 1944-1949, 1996). Dean Acheson , Under Secretary of State at the time, claimed the credit for the "containment" policy, convincing Congressional leaders that the Soviets were about to take Greece as well as Yugoslavia, turn their influence into political bedrocks in Italy and France, advance their zone of influence through the Straits, into Iran, Asia Minor and then Africa. This early articulation of a "domino theory" certainly has to be true, even though the facts say something different. The Soviet Union had already been rebuffed in the Straits and Iran, had urged moderation on the Greek guerillas, and had urged their supporters in the Western communist parties to devote themselves to the reconstruction of capitalist democracies, and the pursuit of a national, reformist road to socialism. According to John Lewis Gaddis, US officials noted that Stalin had long given up any notion of exporting revolution, and was well on its way to abandoning socialism for good . The Comintern had not held a congress since 1935 and, at any rate, was later dissolved by Stalin. General Patrick J Hurley had informed Chiang Kai-shek in November 1943 on behalf of Roosevelt that Stalin had renounced world revolution. Representative John W. McCormack of Massacheusetts told the House of Representatives that the dissolution of the Comintern signalled the "renunciation of world revolution". (John Lewis Gaddis, "The Origins of the Cold War, 1941-47", 1977, p33 & pp48-9).
And somehow it seems that the main concern was not "Russian military power ... it is Russian political power which is threatening us", or so claimed George Kennan , probably one of the many Communists to have infiltrated the US government. The even more fanatically leftist John Foster Dulles claimed to his brother Allen, director of the CIA, that the communists appealed to "the poor people" who "have always wanted to plunder the rich". Obviously, such claims are laughable since they would suggest that the US was primarily interested in preventing "the poor people" from plundering the rich.

Well, we can discount all of the above as so much Commie rhetoric, but yet I confess my continued befuddlement - which, you will pardon me, is certainly licensed when you consider what the history books say. The US only ever exercised its power in the interests of democracy. That is axiomatic. Yet if this is so, I cannot account for What Happened Next. Brazil , for instance, was a splendid example of democracy in action in the 1950s and early 1960s, a Rooseveltian land of reforms to the benefit of civil society. Kubitschek, Quatros and then Goulart all presided over administrations which strengthened labour and peasant organisations, much as a true democracy would – no Soviet-style repression here. Yet, somehow, the United States seems to have blundered into collaboration in an ugly military coup in 1964, precipitating a sinister era of starvation, beatings, expulsions from land, and murder. (Bishop Dom Pedro Casaldaliga, "The Gospel is My Weapon", 12th December, 1975, Latin American Press). Shurely shome mishtake?

And it doesn't stop there! Why, they seem to have mistaken the dictators Somoza, Trujillos, Duvalier, Marcos, Suharto and Diem for Jeffersonian democrats, eagerly implementing the programme of the Founding Fathers. General Suharto, it seems, was sat in a room with Henry Kissinger on the day he decided to launch a massive assault on East Timor, culminating in the slaughter of up to 700,000 people. Kissinger bewilderingly claims that he was not aware that Suharto was about to launch a campaign of genocide against the East Timorese, but transcripts of the meeting have Kissinger and a Mr Newsome from the State Department being specifically informed of those intentions. Moreover, they discussed how they could help cover up those crimes in the US and continue to supply weapons to the regime throughout the assault . The Indonesian military proceeded to march people into fields, only to machine gun them down, herd thousands into schools and set fire to them, shooting anyone who tried to escape the blaze, and rampage through the mountain slopes, killing anyone in their path. Kissinger then secretly and illegally reopened normal relations with Indonesia and continued the flow of arms to the regime, in violation of Congressional legislation. Why would such a patent democrat and friend of freedom engage such a course of action? A mistake? A misperception of what was involved? Did he believe the Indonesian Generals were warding off a Soviet threat? Of course! It was because the manky little Timorese bastards were turning communist, leaning their weight behind the marxist Freitilin instead of the fascist UDT! (Robin Osborne, Australian, 26th February 1975). Obviously, this Soviet aggression in the heart of South East Asia had to be repelled, and if the General was good enough to do it, I'm good enough to say a hearty thank you.

Still, I am still puzzled by the other examples I raised and even more worried by what I am about to tell you. In 1972, the minority administration in Burundi sought "to kill every possible Hutu male of distinction over the age of fourteen". (Michael Bowen, Gary Freedman, Kay Miller & Roger Morris, "Passing By, The United States and Genocide in Burundi", Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1972). You will hardly believe what I am about to tell you, but the United States government apparently refused to raise any protest about the massacre, even though it was the major trading partner with Burundi at the time. They had a busy schedule, of course, I completely understand. But the communists wouldn't! They would try and make something of it, as if the US didn’t really care about atrocities and the exigencies of tyranny. And isn't that the real tragedy here?

Oh, but darlings, sweet freedom-loving bunnies, prepare your ears for this! The American government seems to have stumbled into the terrorism business! Oh, I know it will shock and awe you to hear this from one of your own brethren, but I assure you it's true. I know it must be some accident of history, or some poor, misguided attempt to contain Soviet aggression. But in the 1980s, the CIA began an attempt to systematically undermine the new regime that had overthrown the Somozist dictatorship (which, remarkably, the United States supported!). They formed a terrorist army, collectively known as the Contras, but operating under distinct names and different commands. Many of their fighters were conscripts - kidnapped, removed to Honduras, and trained at a CIA camp. Drugs - drugs! - were used to fund these evil bastards as they tore across Nicaragua, slaughtering teachers and pupils, nurses and patients, raping and torturing, slicing off womens' breasts, leaving hacked bodies by the roadside. 30,000 died in what Oxfam called "The Threat of a Good Example". Friends, I am physically shaking. I have no idea what Oxfam meant by that infelicitous phrase since the United States seeks nothing more than to provide a Good Example to the rest of the world. But this action, surely, was not - well, you know, I do wonder if perhaps the Soviets didn't have a hand in all this. Being the evil bastards that they were, they probably put the Sandinista regime in power and ensured it won 67% in the 1984 election. Yes, probably in a deliberate attempt to provoke our American friends into acting out of turn. And, yes, somewhere I read that the Nicaraguans were taking migs from the Soviets - but that, very tragically, turns out to be a lie. (Miami Herald, 21st December 1986). Can we judge the US for this? Is it fair to slander so benevolent a power with the charge that it is run by a band of vicious mercenaries, dedicated to shoring up their own power no matter how much blood accrues at their feet? Surely not.

And yet, my avid little coalition-of-the-willing, there is more. It has engaged in terrorist activities against Libya, Angola, Morroco, Cuba, El Salvador, assaults on democracy in Suriname, the Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Iran, Greece, Italy, Albania, Australia, Bulgaria, Jamaica, even our darling Great Britain, support for dictatorships like Ecuador, Thailand, the Phillipines, Haiti, South Korea, Noriega in Panama, Mobutu in Zaire, Hussein in Iraq, the Shah in Iran and military assaults on non-aggressive states like Grenada, the Seychelles and virtually everywhere else it has chosen to invade. In only a fraction of these cases was the Soviet Union involved, and then usually as a bit player.

Friends, allies, I wish I knew how to express the parlous state I'm in. My stomach feels like it is being sucked into hell, and my soul is rushing to join it. Who but a lunatic, a heretic, an anti-American traitor, a terrorist sympathiser, a liberal bedwetter, a communist could entertain such facts - by which I mean, thoughts? Forgive me, father, for I have sinned. I have dreamed that the world is ruled by corrupt, violent, power-brokers interested in sustaining their own privileges. I have imagined that the men we know to be holy and wise are little more than high class crooks, Mafia dons, Shakespearean villans with none of the poetry or grandeur.

Still, that was in the bad old days! Even if it's all true - and it bloody well certainly probably isn't! - that's in the past. The world was balanced on a knife-edge, Soviet aggression and, er, my tactics only help the evil-doers. Or something. But there's more. I hasten to say that I cannot credit a word that is coming out of my morose little gob right now, but some evil, Cartesian demon has hold of me, is feeding me illusion, deceit, compelling me to perceive what cannot be. I must communicate my fears.

They didn't stop with the terrorism already, even when the Cold War finished. I can't understand why, but they started to interfere in countries which didn't have any communist threat in them. In Colombia, they've been funding the government and far right paramilitaries in their endless war on trade unionists, workers and peasants. In Turkey, they sponsored the massacre of the Kurds during the mid-Nineties . In Indonesia, Clinton helped train the military in the "Iron Balance" programme, in direct violation of existing US legislation. He then helped block any response to the increasing Indonesian massacre in Timor, following the massive Timorese vote for independence, until they had finished their job and were pulling out. In Haiti, they supported military forces as they overthrew the democratically elected Aristide, until they had obtained from Aristide a promise not to fulfill any of the crazy promises he'd been making to the poor. Of course, of course! I know Aristide was a communist. Yes, of course. And the Timorese were communists too, we remember. And the Kurds have a pretty big communist party. But... dearies, I hate to ask these questions... what possible threat do these commie scum pose to America's Divine Splendour?

I am lost. I am at sea. Send the marines! Help! Help!!

7:24:00 pm | Permalink | Comments thread | | Print | Digg | del.icio.us | reddit | StumbleUpon | diigo it Tweet| Share| Flattr this

Search via Google

Info

Richard Seymour

Richard Seymour's Wiki

Richard Seymour: information and contact

Richard Seymour's agent

RSS

Twitter

Tumblr

Pinterest

Academia

Storify

Donate

corbyn_9781784785314-max_221-32100507bd25b752de8c389f93cd0bb4

Against Austerity cover

Subscription options

Flattr this

Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Recent Posts

Subscribe to Lenin's Tomb
Email:

Lenosphere

Archives

September 2001

June 2003

July 2003

August 2003

September 2003

October 2003

November 2003

December 2003

January 2004

February 2004

March 2004

April 2004

May 2004

June 2004

July 2004

August 2004

September 2004

October 2004

November 2004

December 2004

January 2005

February 2005

March 2005

April 2005

May 2005

June 2005

July 2005

August 2005

September 2005

October 2005

November 2005

December 2005

January 2006

February 2006

March 2006

April 2006

May 2006

June 2006

July 2006

August 2006

September 2006

October 2006

November 2006

December 2006

January 2007

February 2007

March 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

August 2007

September 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

May 2008

June 2008

July 2008

August 2008

September 2008

October 2008

November 2008

December 2008

January 2009

February 2009

March 2009

April 2009

May 2009

June 2009

July 2009

August 2009

September 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

January 2010

February 2010

March 2010

April 2010

May 2010

June 2010

July 2010

August 2010

September 2010

October 2010

November 2010

December 2010

January 2011

February 2011

March 2011

April 2011

May 2011

June 2011

July 2011

August 2011

September 2011

October 2011

November 2011

December 2011

January 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

June 2012

July 2012

August 2012

September 2012

October 2012

November 2012

December 2012

January 2013

February 2013

March 2013

April 2013

May 2013

June 2013

July 2013

August 2013

September 2013

October 2013

November 2013

December 2013

January 2014

February 2014

March 2014

April 2014

May 2014

June 2014

July 2014

August 2014

September 2014

October 2014

November 2014

December 2014

January 2015

February 2015

March 2015

April 2015

May 2015

June 2015

July 2015

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

December 2015

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

June 2016

July 2016

August 2016

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

January 2017

February 2017

March 2017

April 2017

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

August 2017

Dossiers

Hurricane Katrina Dossier

Suicide Bombing Dossier

Iraqi Resistance Dossier

Haiti Dossier

Christopher Hitchens Dossier

Organic Intellectuals

Michael Rosen

Left Flank

Necessary Agitation

China Miéville

Je Est Un Autre

Verso

Doug Henwood

Michael Lavalette

Entschindet und Vergeht

The Mustard Seed

Solomon's Minefield

3arabawy

Sursock

Left Now

Le Poireau Rouge

Complex System of Pipes

Le Colonel Chabert [see archives]

K-Punk

Faithful to the Line

Jews Sans Frontieres

Institute for Conjunctural Research

The Proles

Infinite Thought

Critical Montages

A Gauche

Histologion

Wat Tyler

Ken McLeod

Unrepentant Marxist

John Molyneux

Rastî

Obsolete

Bureau of Counterpropaganda

Prisoner of Starvation

Kotaji

Through The Scary Door

Historical Materialism

1820

General, Your Tank is a Powerful Vehicle

Fruits of our Labour

Left I on the News

Organized Rage

Another Green World

Climate and Capitalism

The View From Steeltown

Long Sunday

Anti-dialectics

Empire Watch [archives]

Killing Time [archives]

Ob Fusc [archives]

Apostate Windbag [archives]

Alphonse [archives]

Dead Men Left [dead, man left]

Bat [archives]

Bionic Octopus [archives]

Keeping the Rabble in Line [archives]

Cliffism [archives]

Antiwar

Antiwar.com

Antiwar.blog

Osama Saeed

Dahr Jamail

Angry Arab

Desert Peace

Abu Aardvark

Juan Cole

Baghdad Burning

Collective Lounge

Iraqi Democrats Against the Occupation

Unfair Witness [archive]

Iraq Occupation & Resistance Report [archive]

Socialism

Socialist Workers Party

Socialist Aotearoa

Globalise Resistance

Red Pepper

Marxists

New Left Review

Socialist Review

Socialist Worker

World Socialist Website

Left Turn

Noam Chomsky

South Africa Keep Left

Monthly Review

Morning Star

Radical Philosophy

Blogger
blog comments powered by Disqus